Back to the design This document is generated from the same calculation run shown on the design screen. Nothing is retyped.
NESR
DOS-SWT-2026-0147 Revision 2
Issued 13 Nov 2026
Surface Well Testing

Design of Service

Post-Stimulation Flowback — well JBL-0142, Jubaylah field
Prepared for Saudi Aramco under WO-4471-26
NOT FOR ISSUE — 1 CRITICAL DESIGN CHECK UNRESOLVED

1Document control and approval

PREPARED BY
Faisal Al-Otaibi
Senior Well Test Engineer
Signature and date
REVIEWED BY
Marwa Saad
Testing Engineering Lead
Signature and date
APPROVED BY
Pending
Signature and date

Revision history

DateByActionDescription
2026-09-01 08:42 Faisal Al-Otaibi created DOS initiated from well programme WO-4471-26
2026-09-04 14:05 Faisal Al-Otaibi revised Rev 1: water cut updated from 8% to 12% following offset well data
2026-09-09 10:18 Faisal Al-Otaibi revised Rev 2: H2S revised to 1850 ppm per latest PVT report
2026-09-09 16:30 Faisal Al-Otaibi submitted review Submitted to Testing Engineering Lead for review

2Scope and objectives

This Design of Service defines the surface well testing programme for well JBL-0142 in the Jubaylah field, producing from the Arab-D reservoir. The objective is a 72 hour post-stimulation flowback at a target liquid rate of 4,500 bbl/d, with the wellhead held at 1,450 psia flowing pressure. All equipment sizing, operating limits and safety distances in this document are derived from the well and fluid data in section 3 using the calculation basis in section 5 and the assumptions register extract in section 8.

ClientSaudi Aramco Client referenceWO-4471-26
Service lineSurface Well Testing Operation typePost-Stimulation Flowback
LocationOnshore Planned start2026-10-06
Planned duration72 hours Service classificationSour (see section 7)

3Well, reservoir and fluid data

Well geometry

True vertical depth8,450 ft
Measured depth9,120 ft
Maximum inclination28.5 °
Casing OD9.625 in
Tubing OD / ID4.500 / 3.958 in
Perforated interval8,180 – 8,310 ft
Packer depth8,050 ft

Reservoir

Reservoir pressure4,250 psia
Reservoir temperature248 °F
Productivity index1.85 stb/d/psi
Bubble point pressure2,150 psia

Produced fluid

Oil gravity34.2 °API
Gas specific gravity0.740
Water specific gravity1.040
Gas-oil ratio620 scf/stb
Water cut12.0 %
Hydrogen sulphide1,850 ppm
Carbon dioxide4.20 mol %
Nitrogen1.10 mol %
Produced solids0.60 lb/1000 bbl

Operating envelope and site

Target liquid rate4,500 bbl/d
Wellhead flowing pressure1,450 psia
Wellhead flowing temperature168 °F
Separator pressure350 psia
Separator inlet target temperature180 °F
Flowline length220 ft
Burner to manned area165 ft
Ambient temperature95 °F
Design wind speed12 mph

4Equipment spread

PositionAssetDescriptionMAWPTemp ratingMaterial classSour
Flowhead FH-5015 Surface Test Tree 5-1/8 in 10K 10,000 psi 250 °F API 6A EE-NL-PSL3-PR1 Yes
Choke Manifold CM-1002 Dual Choke Manifold 3-1/16 in 10K 10,000 psi 250 °F API 6A EE-NL-PSL3 Yes
Flowline FL-0400 4 in Sch 160 flowline, 10K rated 10,000 psi 250 °F ASTM A106 Gr.B / NACE Yes
Heater HT-0500 Indirect Glycol Bath Heater 5.0 MMBtu/hr 10,000 psi 250 °F ASME Sec VIII Div 1 Yes
Separator SP-1440 3-Phase Horizontal Separator 1440 psi, 42 in x 12 ft 1,440 psi 250 °F ASME Sec VIII Div 1 / NACE Yes
Surge Tank ST-0100 Atmospheric Surge Tank 100 bbl 50 psi 150 °F API 12F Yes
Burner BN-4801 Green Dragon Oil Burner, twin head — — — No
Esd ES-0001 Wellhead ESD Panel, 3-station — — — Yes

5Design calculations

Each value below is produced by the platform's calculation engine from the data in section 3. The governing expression and the substituted values are printed with every result so that the calculation can be checked line by line without access to the software.

5.1 Fluid properties

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Oil specific gravity (γ_o) 0.8540 -
γ_o = 141.5 / (131.5 + °API)
141.5 / (131.5 + 34.2) = 0.8540
API standard gravity definition
Oil rate at target (q_o) 3,960 stb/d
q_o = q_liq × (1 − WC)
4,500 × (1 − 0.120) = 3,960
Test objective
Water rate at target (q_w) 540 bbl/d
q_w = q_liq × WC
4,500 × 0.120 = 540
Test objective
Associated gas rate (q_g) 2.455 MMscf/d
q_g = q_o × GOR
3,960 × 620 = 2,455,200 scf/d
Test objective
Gas-liquid ratio (R) 546 scf/bbl
GLR = q_g / q_liq
2,455,200 / 4,500 = 546
Drives the choke correlation
Blended liquid specific gravity (γ_l) 0.8763 -
γ_l = (1 − WC)·γ_o + WC·γ_w
(1 − 0.120)·0.8540 + 0.120·1.0400 = 0.8763
Volume-weighted blend
Pseudo-critical temperature (sweet basis) (T_pc) 387.3 °R
T_pc = 169.2 + 349.5·γ_g − 74.0·γ_g²
169.2 + 349.5(0.7400) − 74.0(0.7400)² = 387.3
Sutton (1985)
Pseudo-critical pressure (sweet basis) (P_pc) 657.9 psia
P_pc = 756.8 − 131.0·γ_g − 3.6·γ_g²
756.8 − 131.0(0.7400) − 3.6(0.7400)² = 657.9
Sutton (1985)
Wichert-Aziz acid gas correction (ε) 7.03 °R
ε = 120(A^0.9 − A^1.6) + 15(B^0.5 − B⁴), A = y_H2S + y_CO2, B = y_H2S
A = 0.04385, B = 0.001850 → ε = 7.03 °R
Wichert & Aziz (1972)
Without this correction the Z-factor for this sour stream would be wrong, and every downstream volume with it.
Gas compressibility at wellhead (Z) 0.8664 -
Z = A + (1−A)/e^B + C·P_pr^D (Brill & Beggs fit to Standing-Katz)
P_pr = 2.245, T_pr = 1.651 → Z = 0.8664
Brill & Beggs (1974)
Gas density at wellhead (ρ_g) 5.326 lb/ft³
ρ_g = 2.70·γ_g·P / (Z·T)
2.70(0.7400)(1,450) / (0.8664 × 627.7) = 5.326
Real gas law
Oil formation volume factor (B_o) 1.3344 rb/stb
B_o = 0.9759 + 0.00012·[R_s·√(γ_g/γ_o) + 1.25·T]^1.2
R_s = 620, T = 168 °F → B_o = 1.3344
Standing (1947)
Total mass flow rate (ṁ) 63,344 lb/hr
ṁ = ṁ_gas + ṁ_oil + ṁ_water
5,781 + 49,365 + 8,198 = 63,344 lb/hr
Mass balance
Gas mass fraction (x_g) 9.1 %
x_g = ṁ_gas / ṁ_total
5,781 / 63,344 = 9.1 %
Used to weight the Joule-Thomson coefficient

5.2 Inflow performance

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Rate at bubble point (q_b) 3,885 stb/d
q_b = J × (P_r − P_b)
1.850 × (4,250 − 2,150) = 3,885
Straight-line IPR above bubble point
Absolute open flow potential (q_max) 6,095 stb/d
q_max = q_b + J·P_b / 1.8
3,885 + 1.850(2,150)/1.8 = 6,095
Vogel (1968) composite IPR
Flowing bottomhole pressure required (P_wf) 2,109 psia
q/q_max = 1 − 0.2(P_wf/P_r) − 0.8(P_wf/P_r)² solved for P_wf
q = 3,960 stb/d → P_wf = 2,109 psia
Vogel (1968)
Drawdown at target rate (ΔP) 2,141 psi
ΔP = P_r − P_wf
4,250 − 2,109 = 2,141
Reservoir management constraint
Fraction of open flow potential 65.0 %
q / q_max
3,960 / 6,095 = 65.0 %
Rate feasibility screen

5.3 Pressure integrity

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Maximum anticipated surface pressure (MASP) 3,435 psia
MASP = P_r · exp(−0.01875·γ_g·TVD / (Z̄·T̄))
4,250 · exp(−0.01875(0.7400)(8,450)/(0.8728 × 631.2)) = 3,435
Compressible static gas column, gas-filled tubing worst case
Minimum equipment rating required 3,779 psia
MAWP_min = MASP × (1 + design margin)
3,435 × (1 + 10%) = 3,779
NESR ES-WT-002 design margin
Rated pressure of weakest upstream item 10,000 psi
min(MAWP) across flowhead, choke manifold and flowline
Surface Test Tree 5-1/8 in 10K (FH-5015) = 10,000 psi
API 6A / ISO 10423 pressure class
Site pressure test value 3,779 psi
P_test = MASP × test factor
3,435 × 1.10 = 3,779
ASME B31.3 / client test procedure
Hold 15 minutes with an acceptance criterion of no visible pressure decay.

5.4 Choke sizing and flow regime

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Required choke bean size (d) 38 64ths in
d = (A · q_liq · R^B / P_wh)^(1/C)
(10.000 × 4,500 × 546^0.546 / 1,450)^(1/1.890) = 38.02 → 38/64 in
Gilbert (1954) multiphase critical flow correlation
Rounded up to the nearest available bean in the manifold.
Equivalent bean diameter 0.5938 in
d_in = d / 64
38 / 64 = 0.5938 in
Bean flow area (A) 0.27688 in²
A = π·d²/4
π(0.5938)²/4 = 0.27688 in²
Pressure drop across the bean (ΔP) 1,100 psi
ΔP = P_wh − P_downstream
1,450 − 350 = 1,100
Drives Joule-Thomson cooling and erosion
Downstream / upstream pressure ratio 0.241 -
P_dn / P_up vs critical ratio
350 / 1,450 = 0.241 (critical at ≤ 0.55)
Isentropic choked flow
Flow is critical. Rate is set by the bean and upstream pressure only, and is independent of separator pressure. This is the condition required for a stable, repeatable test.
CorrelationABCBean (64ths)Bean (in)
Gilbert (1954) 10.000 0.546 1.890 38.0 0.5940
Ros (1960) 17.400 0.500 2.000 35.5 0.5549
Baxendell (1957) 9.560 0.546 1.930 34.4 0.5382
Achong (1961) 3.820 0.650 1.880 32.9 0.5144

5.5 Flowline erosional velocity

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Mixture density at flowline conditions (ρ_m) 10.276 lb/ft³
ρ_m = (12409·γ_l·P + 2.7·R·γ_g·P) / (198.7·P + R·T·Z)
P = 350 psia, T = 639.7 °R, R = 546 scf/bbl, Z = 0.9683 → 10.276 lb/ft³
API RP 14E section 2.5
Applied erosional C-factor (C) 125.0 -
C = C_intermittent × (sand derate if applicable)
125, no derate (sand 0.60 pptb < 1.0 pptb trigger)
API RP 14E + NESR ES-WT-011
Erosional velocity limit (V_e) 38.99 ft/s
V_e = C / √ρ_m
125.0 / √10.276 = 38.99 ft/s
API RP 14E
Actual volumetric flow at flowline conditions (q) 1.8005 ft³/s
q = q_gas·B_g/86400 + (q_o·B_o + q_w)·5.615/86400
gas 1.4221 + liquid 0.3785 = 1.8005 ft³/s
Actual mixture velocity (V) 27.93 ft/s
V = q / A, A = π·d²/4
1.8005 / 0.06447 = 27.93 ft/s (3.438 in ID)
Erosional velocity ratio (EVR) 0.716 -
EVR = V / V_e
27.93 / 38.99 = 0.716
Design target ≤ 0.80
Minimum flowline ID to satisfy the limit (d_min) 2.910 in
d_min = √(4q / (π·V_e))
√(4×1.8005 / (π×38.99)) = 2.910 in
Produced solids mass rate 0.113 lb/hr
ṁ_sand = q_liq × sand / 1000 / 24
4,500 × 0.60 / 1000 / 24 = 0.113 lb/hr
Sand management trigger

5.6 Joule-Thomson cooling, hydrates and heating

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Effective Joule-Thomson coefficient (μ_JT) 0.00865 °F/psi
μ_JT = x_g·μ_gas + (1 − x_g)·μ_liquid
0.0913(0.0450) + 0.9087(0.0050) = 0.00865 °F/psi
Mass-weighted from the stream composition
Weighting matters: a gas well cools an order of magnitude more across the same pressure drop than an oil well.
Temperature drop across the bean (ΔT) 9.5 °F
ΔT = μ_JT × ΔP
0.00865 × 1,100 = 9.5 °F
Joule-Thomson expansion
Temperature downstream of the bean (T_dn) 158.5 °F
T_dn = T_wh − ΔT
168 − 9.5 = 158.5 °F
Hydrate formation temperature at separator pressure (T_h) 52.1 °F
T_h = −238.245 + 78.997·log P − 5.353·(log P)² + 349.474·γ_g − 150.855·γ_g² − 27.604·γ_g·log P
P = 350 psia, γ_g = 0.7400 → T_h = 52.1 °F
Motiee (1991)
Minimum process temperature 180.0 °F
T_req = max(T_h + margin, T_separator target)
max(52.1 + 10, 180) = 180.0 °F
Hydrate margin NESR ES-WT-004; separator target set by emulsion and viscosity control
Heating required 21.5 °F
ΔT_heat = T_req − T_dn
180.0 − 158.5 = 21.5 °F
Process heat duty (Q) 0.755 MMBtu/hr
Q = Σ(ṁ_i · c_p,i) · ΔT
(5,781×0.55 + 49,365×0.48 + 8,198×1.00) × 21.5 = 754,607 Btu/hr
Sensible heat balance, GPSA specific heats
Fired duty required 1.132 MMBtu/hr
Q_fired = Q × design factor / thermal efficiency
0.755 × 1.20 / 0.80 = 1.132 MMBtu/hr
Vendor efficiency, NESR ES-WT-006 design factor

5.7 Three-phase separation

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Gas density at separator (ρ_g) 1.1289 lb/ft³
ρ_g = 2.70·γ_g·P / (Z·T)
P = 350 psia, T = 180 °F, Z = 0.9683 → 1.1289 lb/ft³
Maximum gas velocity before carryover (V_max) 2.755 ft/s
V_max = K·√((ρ_l − ρ_g)/ρ_g)
0.40·√((54.68 − 1.1289)/1.1289) = 2.755 ft/s
Souders-Brown, API 12J, K for horizontal vessel with mist extractor
Gas disengagement area 4.811 ft²
A_gas = (1 − fill)·π·D²/4
(1 − 0.50)·π(3.50)²/4 = 4.811 ft²
Half-full horizontal vessel design case
Separator gas capacity 22.88 MMscf/d
q_max = V_max · A_gas · 86400 / B_g
2.755 × 4.811 × 86400 / 0.05004 = 22.88 MMscf/d
API 12J
Gas capacity utilisation 10.7 %
q_gas / q_max
2.455 / 22.88 = 10.7 %
Liquid volume required for retention 52.64 ft³
V = (q_o·t_o + q_w·t_w) × 5.615 / 1440
(3,960×3.0 + 540×3.0) × 5.615 / 1440 = 52.64 ft³
API 12J retention times
Liquid volume available 57.73 ft³
V = fill · π·D²/4 · L
0.50 · π(3.50)²/4 · 12.0 = 57.73 ft³
Separator liquid capacity 4,935 bbl/d
q_max = V_avail / 5.615 × 1440 / t_retention
57.73 / 5.615 × 1440 / 3.0 = 4,935 bbl/d
API 12J
Liquid capacity utilisation 91.2 %
V_required / V_available
52.64 / 57.73 = 91.2 %

5.8 Burner thermal radiation

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Total heat release at the burner (Q) 1,010.8 MMBtu/hr
Q = ṁ_oil·LHV_oil + q_gas·LHV_gas
49,365 lb/hr × 18,300 + 102,300 scf/hr × 1,050 = 1,010,796,227 Btu/hr
GPSA heating values
Flame length (L) 120.9 ft
L = 0.006 · Q^0.478
0.006 × (1,010,796,227)^0.478 = 120.9 ft
API STD 521 Annex C
Fraction of heat radiated (F) 0.200 -
Selected by combustion type
Oil burner → F = 0.200
API STD 521 Annex C
Safe distance, continuously manned area (D) 179 ft
D = √(τ·F·Q / (4π·K))
√(1.00 × 0.200 × 1,010,796,227 / (4π × 500)) = 179 ft
API STD 521 Table 8, 1.58 kW/m²
Radiation at the planned stand-off (K) 591 Btu/hr·ft²
K = τ·F·Q / (4π·D²)
τ·F·Q / (4π × 165²) = 591 Btu/hr·ft² (1.86 kW/m²)
API STD 521
Exposure categoryLimitEquivalentMinimum distance
Continuously manned area 500 Btu/hr·ft² 1.58 kW/m² 179 ft
Escape route, seconds of exposure 1,500 Btu/hr·ft² 4.73 kW/m² 104 ft
Equipment and unmanned areas 2,000 Btu/hr·ft² 6.31 kW/m² 90 ft

5.9 Sour service classification

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
H₂S partial pressure at MASP (p_H2S) 6.3552 psia
p_H2S = y_H2S × P
(1,850 / 10⁶) × 3,435 = 6.3552 psia
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-1
Service classification Sour service
p_H2S ≥ 0.05 psia → sour service
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156
All wetted pressure-containing components must carry NACE MR0175 certification, and personnel controls for H₂S apply for the full duration of the test.
Personal alarm set point 10 ppm
Fixed by HSE case
10 ppm
Client HSE case
Immediately dangerous to life or health 100 ppm
NIOSH IDLH
100 ppm
NIOSH

6Design limit verification

Every check below is evaluated automatically against the standard named in the basis column. A critical failure prevents this document from being issued.

RefCheckResult Actual vs limitFinding and basis
RAD-001 Thermal radiation at manned areas
critical
FAIL 591 Btu/hr·ft²
500 Btu/hr·ft²
At the planned 165 ft stand-off, radiation reaches 591 Btu/hr·ft² against the 500 Btu/hr·ft² limit for continuously manned areas. Minimum acceptable stand-off is 179 ft.
Action required: Move the manned area to at least 179 ft, extend the burner boom, deploy the water curtain, or reduce the flowing rate.
API STD 521 Table 8 / IOGP 434-18
SEP-002 Separator liquid retention capacity
critical
CAUTION 91.2 %
≤ 85 %
Vessel is loaded above the design comfort threshold. Any rate increase during the test will push it past capacity.
Action required: Select the next size separator, reduce the target rate, or raise separator pressure to shrink gas volume.
API SPEC 12J
SOU-002 H₂S exposure controls
major
CAUTION 1,850 ppm in stream
IDLH 100 ppm
Stream H₂S concentration exceeds the IDLH threshold. Continuous gas detection, cascade breathing air, wind socks, muster points and a documented H₂S contingency plan are mandatory for the full test.
Action required: Attach the H₂S contingency plan and the drill record to this DOS before issue.
NIOSH / client HSE case
CHK-001 Critical flow across the bean
major
PASS ratio 0.241
≤ 0.55
The bean is in critical flow, so measured rates will be stable and independent of downstream conditions.
Isentropic choked flow, k ≈ 1.27
CHK-002 Choke correlation sensitivity
advisory
PASS 13.4 % spread
below 40 %
The four published correlations disagree by 13.4 % on bean size for this fluid. The correlations are in reasonable agreement for this fluid.
Comparison of Gilbert, Ros, Baxendell and Achong
DEL-001 Target rate against inflow performance
major
PASS 65.0 % of AOF
below 90 % of AOF
The target rate is comfortably inside the well's deliverability.
Vogel (1968) IPR from the supplied productivity index
ERO-001 Erosional velocity in the flowline
critical
PASS EVR 0.716
≤ 0.80
Velocity is at 72 % of the erosional limit with adequate margin.
API RP 14E
FLU-001 Z-factor correlation validity
advisory
PASS T_pr 1.65 / P_pr 2.24
1.15 < T_pr < 2.4, P_pr < 15
Wellhead conditions are inside the published validity window of the correlation.
Brill & Beggs (1974)
HYD-001 Hydrate formation margin downstream of the bean
critical
PASS 106.4 °F margin
≥ 10 °F
Stream stays 106.4 °F above the hydrate curve without heating.
Motiee (1991) hydrate correlation, NESR ES-WT-004 margin
HYD-002 Heater duty adequacy
major
PASS 1.132 MMBtu/hr required
5.00 MMBtu/hr rated
Selected heater covers the fired duty at 23 % utilisation. The selected 5.0 MMBtu/hr unit is significantly oversized at 23 % utilisation; a smaller unit would reduce mobilisation cost.
NESR ES-WT-006
PRS-001 Upstream pressure containment
critical
PASS MASP 3,435 psia
MAWP 10,000 psi
Weakest upstream component is rated 10,000 psi against a MASP of 3,435 psia, a margin of 65.6 %.
API 6A / NESR ES-WT-002
PRS-002 Separator relief protection
critical
PASS Operating 350 psia
MAWP 1,440 psi
Separator rating is adequate for the planned operating pressure. A relief valve sized for the choke-washout case is still required.
Action required: Confirm PSV set pressure at or below the vessel MAWP and size it for full choke bypass flow.
API RP 14C / API 12J
SEP-001 Separator gas handling capacity
critical
PASS 10.7 %
≤ 85 %
Vessel has adequate capacity for the design case.
API SPEC 12J
SOU-001 Sour service material compliance
critical
PASS 6.3552 psia H₂S
≥ 0.05 psia triggers sour service
Sour service confirmed at 6.355 psia H₂S partial pressure. All rated components on the spread carry NACE MR0175 certification.
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156

7Operating limits and safety envelope

ParameterLimitBasis
Maximum anticipated surface pressure3,435 psiaStatic gas column from reservoir pressure
Site pressure test value3,779 psi, 15 minute holdASME B31.3 / client test procedure
Choke bean, design case38/64 inGoverned choke correlation
Minimum separator inlet temperature52 °F + 10 °F marginHydrate control
Maximum flowline velocity39.0 ft/sAPI RP 14E erosional limit
Separator operating pressure350 psiaDesign case, PSV set at vessel MAWP
Minimum stand-off, manned areas179 ftAPI STD 521, 500 Btu/hr·ft²
H₂S personal alarm10 ppm, evacuate at 15 ppmClient HSE case
ESD closure, surface safety valve7 seconds maximumAPI RP 14C

8Assumptions register extract

The constants, correlation coefficients and design limits below were read from the company assumptions register at the time this document was generated. Each carries its revision number, so the calculation can be reproduced exactly at any future date.

CategoryAssumptionValue RevBasis
Choke model Achong coefficient A 3.82 - 1 Achong (1961)
Choke model Achong exponent B (GLR) 0.65 - 1 Achong (1961)
Choke model Achong exponent C (bean) 1.88 - 1 Achong (1961)
Choke model Baxendell coefficient A 9.56 - 1 Baxendell (1957)
Choke model Baxendell exponent B (GLR) 0.546 - 1 Baxendell (1957)
Choke model Baxendell exponent C (bean) 1.93 - 1 Baxendell (1957)
Choke model Critical (sonic) pressure ratio 0.55 Pdn/Pup 2 Isentropic choked flow, k~1.27
Choke model Gilbert coefficient A 10 - 1 Gilbert (1954), API 14B practice
Choke model Gilbert exponent B (GLR) 0.546 - 1 Gilbert (1954)
Choke model Gilbert exponent C (bean) 1.89 - 1 Gilbert (1954)
Choke model Ros coefficient A 17.4 - 1 Ros (1960)
Choke model Ros exponent B (GLR) 0.5 - 1 Ros (1960)
Choke model Ros exponent C (bean) 2 - 1 Ros (1960)
Deliverability Vogel IPR coefficient on (Pwf/Pr) 0.2 - 1 Vogel (1968)
Deliverability Vogel IPR coefficient on (Pwf/Pr)^2 0.8 - 1 Vogel (1968)
Erosion API 14E C-factor, intermittent service 125 - 1 API RP 14E 2.5
Erosion C-factor derating when sand is present 0.6 fraction 3 NESR internal ES-WT-011
Erosion Erosional velocity ratio caution threshold 0.8 - 1 NESR internal ES-WT-011
Erosion Sand concentration triggering derate 1 pptb 2 NESR internal ES-WT-011
Heating Heater duty design factor 1.2 - 2 NESR internal ES-WT-006
Heating Indirect heater thermal efficiency 0.8 fraction 1 Vendor data, glycol bath heaters
Heating Specific heat of crude oil 0.48 Btu/lb-degF 1 GPSA Data Book Sec. 23
Heating Specific heat of gas 0.55 Btu/lb-degF 1 GPSA Data Book Fig. 24-7
Heating Specific heat of produced water 1 Btu/lb-degF 1 Standard
Hydrates Joule-Thomson cooling coefficient, gas phase 0.045 degF/psi 4 Field-calibrated, MENA gas 0.6-0.75 SG
Hydrates Minimum margin above hydrate formation temperature 10 degF 2 NESR internal ES-WT-004
Pressure integrity Minimum margin of equipment MAWP over MASP 10 % 3 NESR internal ES-WT-002
Pressure integrity Site pressure test factor on MOP 1.1 - 1 ASME B31.3 / client procedure
Radiation Atmospheric transmissivity 1 - 1 API STD 521 6.4.2
Radiation Flame length correlation coefficient 0.006 - 1 API STD 521 Annex C
Radiation Flame length correlation exponent 0.478 - 1 API STD 521 Annex C
Radiation Fraction of heat radiated, oil burner 0.2 - 1 API STD 521 Annex C
Radiation Lower heating value of associated gas 1,050 Btu/scf 2 GPSA Data Book Sec. 23
Radiation Lower heating value of crude 18,300 Btu/lb 1 GPSA Data Book Sec. 23
Radiation Radiation limit, continuously manned area 500 Btu/hr-ft2 1 API STD 521 Table 8 (1.58 kW/m2)
Radiation Radiation limit, equipment and unmanned areas 2,000 Btu/hr-ft2 1 API STD 521 Table 8 (6.31 kW/m2)
Radiation Radiation limit, escape route, few seconds exposure 1,500 Btu/hr-ft2 1 API STD 521 Table 8 (4.73 kW/m2)
Separation Design liquid fill fraction of separator volume 0.5 fraction 1 API 12J
Separation Oil retention time 3 minutes 2 API 12J Table 1, 30-40 API crude
Separation Separator utilisation caution threshold 0.85 fraction 1 NESR internal ES-WT-008
Separation Souders-Brown K, horizontal vessel with mist extractor 0.4 ft/s 1 API 12J / Arnold & Stewart
Separation Water retention time 3 minutes 1 API 12J Table 1
Sour service H2S immediately dangerous to life or health 100 ppm 1 NIOSH
Sour service H2S partial pressure threshold for sour service 0.05 psia 1 NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-1
Sour service H2S personal alarm set point 10 ppm 1 OSHA / client HSE case

9Reference standards

ReferenceTitleEditionApplied to
API RP 14CAnalysis, Design, Installation and Testing of Basic Surface Safety Systems 8th Ed.ESD architecture and relief protection
API RP 14EDesign and Installation of Offshore Production Platform Piping Systems 5th Ed.Erosional velocity limits, flowline sizing
API SPEC 12JSpecification for Oil and Gas Separators 8th Ed.Separator gas and liquid capacity
API SPEC 6ASpecification for Wellhead and Christmas Tree Equipment 21st Ed.Pressure ratings of flow control equipment
API STD 521Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems 7th Ed.Flare / burner thermal radiation and flame length
ASME B31.3Process Piping 2022Flowline wall thickness and test pressure
IOGP 434-18Risk assessment data - thermal radiation exposure 2019Personnel exposure thresholds
ISO 10423Wellhead and christmas tree equipment 2009Equipment pressure/temperature class
NACE MR0175Materials for use in H2S-containing environments (ISO 15156) 2015Sour service classification
Generated by the NESR Engineering Design Platform, Surface Well Testing module, on 13 Nov 2026 at 20:41. Calculation run reference DOS-SWT-2026-0147/R2/fab6da4bc2. This document is uncontrolled when printed.