Back to the design This document is generated from the same calculation run shown on the design screen. Nothing is retyped.
NESR
DOS-SWT-2026-0151 Revision 0
Issued 13 Nov 2026
Surface Well Testing

Design of Service

HP/HT Exploration DST — well SHB-003, Sahba field
Prepared for Kuwait Oil Company under KOC-EXP-118
NOT FOR ISSUE — 2 CRITICAL DESIGN CHECKS UNRESOLVED

1Document control and approval

PREPARED BY
Faisal Al-Otaibi
Senior Well Test Engineer
Signature and date
REVIEWED BY
Pending
Signature and date
APPROVED BY
Pending
Signature and date

Revision history

DateByActionDescription
2026-09-11 09:15 Faisal Al-Otaibi created DOS initiated for HP/HT exploration DST

2Scope and objectives

This Design of Service defines the surface well testing programme for well SHB-003 in the Sahba field, producing from the Najmah reservoir. The objective is a 96 hour hp/ht exploration dst at a target liquid rate of 1,200 bbl/d, with the wellhead held at 5,200 psia flowing pressure. All equipment sizing, operating limits and safety distances in this document are derived from the well and fluid data in section 3 using the calculation basis in section 5 and the assumptions register extract in section 8.

ClientKuwait Oil Company Client referenceKOC-EXP-118
Service lineSurface Well Testing Operation typeHP/HT Exploration DST
LocationOnshore Planned start2026-10-19
Planned duration96 hours Service classificationSour (see section 7)

3Well, reservoir and fluid data

Well geometry

True vertical depth14,200 ft
Measured depth14,850 ft
Maximum inclination12.0 °
Casing OD7.000 in
Tubing OD / ID3.500 / 2.992 in
Perforated interval13,960 – 14,080 ft
Packer depth13,800 ft

Reservoir

Reservoir pressure9,850 psia
Reservoir temperature312 °F
Productivity index0.42 stb/d/psi
Bubble point pressure5,200 psia

Produced fluid

Oil gravity52.0 °API
Gas specific gravity0.810
Water specific gravity1.060
Gas-oil ratio12,500 scf/stb
Water cut4.0 %
Hydrogen sulphide12,400 ppm
Carbon dioxide8.60 mol %
Nitrogen2.20 mol %
Produced solids0.60 lb/1000 bbl

Operating envelope and site

Target liquid rate1,200 bbl/d
Wellhead flowing pressure5,200 psia
Wellhead flowing temperature205 °F
Separator pressure900 psia
Separator inlet target temperature140 °F
Flowline length260 ft
Burner to manned area240 ft
Ambient temperature88 °F
Design wind speed9 mph

4Equipment spread

PositionAssetDescriptionMAWPTemp ratingMaterial classSour
Flowhead FH-3015 Surface Test Tree 3-1/16 in 15K 15,000 psi 350 °F API 6A FF-HH-PSL3G-PR2 Yes
Choke Manifold CM-1503 Dual Choke Manifold 3-1/16 in 15K 15,000 psi 350 °F API 6A FF-HH-PSL3G Yes
Flowline FL-0300 3 in Sch 160 flowline, 10K rated 10,000 psi 250 °F ASTM A106 Gr.B / NACE Yes
Heater HT-1000 Indirect Bath Heater 10.0 MMBtu/hr 15,000 psi 350 °F ASME Sec VIII Div 1 Yes
Separator SP-2160 3-Phase Horizontal Separator 2160 psi, 48 in x 15 ft 2,160 psi 300 °F ASME Sec VIII Div 1 / NACE Yes
Gas Flare GF-0801 Vertical Gas Flare Stack 8 in, 40 ft — — — No
Esd ES-0001 Wellhead ESD Panel, 3-station — — — Yes

5Design calculations

Each value below is produced by the platform's calculation engine from the data in section 3. The governing expression and the substituted values are printed with every result so that the calculation can be checked line by line without access to the software.

5.1 Fluid properties

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Oil specific gravity (γ_o) 0.7711 -
γ_o = 141.5 / (131.5 + °API)
141.5 / (131.5 + 52.0) = 0.7711
API standard gravity definition
Oil rate at target (q_o) 1,152 stb/d
q_o = q_liq × (1 − WC)
1,200 × (1 − 0.040) = 1,152
Test objective
Water rate at target (q_w) 48 bbl/d
q_w = q_liq × WC
1,200 × 0.040 = 48
Test objective
Associated gas rate (q_g) 14.400 MMscf/d
q_g = q_o × GOR
1,152 × 12,500 = 14,400,000 scf/d
Test objective
Gas-liquid ratio (R) 12,000 scf/bbl
GLR = q_g / q_liq
14,400,000 / 1,200 = 12,000
Drives the choke correlation
Blended liquid specific gravity (γ_l) 0.7827 -
γ_l = (1 − WC)·γ_o + WC·γ_w
(1 − 0.040)·0.7711 + 0.040·1.0600 = 0.7827
Volume-weighted blend
Pseudo-critical temperature (sweet basis) (T_pc) 403.7 °R
T_pc = 169.2 + 349.5·γ_g − 74.0·γ_g²
169.2 + 349.5(0.8100) − 74.0(0.8100)² = 403.7
Sutton (1985)
Pseudo-critical pressure (sweet basis) (P_pc) 648.3 psia
P_pc = 756.8 − 131.0·γ_g − 3.6·γ_g²
756.8 − 131.0(0.8100) − 3.6(0.8100)² = 648.3
Sutton (1985)
Wichert-Aziz acid gas correction (ε) 13.62 °R
ε = 120(A^0.9 − A^1.6) + 15(B^0.5 − B⁴), A = y_H2S + y_CO2, B = y_H2S
A = 0.09840, B = 0.012400 → ε = 13.62 °R
Wichert & Aziz (1972)
Without this correction the Z-factor for this sour stream would be wrong, and every downstream volume with it.
Gas compressibility at wellhead (Z) 1.0140 -
Z = A + (1−A)/e^B + C·P_pr^D (Brill & Beggs fit to Standing-Katz)
P_pr = 8.304, T_pr = 1.704 → Z = 1.0140
Brill & Beggs (1974)
Gas density at wellhead (ρ_g) 16.872 lb/ft³
ρ_g = 2.70·γ_g·P / (Z·T)
2.70(0.8100)(5,200) / (1.0140 × 664.7) = 16.872
Real gas law
Oil formation volume factor (B_o) 11.4138 rb/stb
B_o = 0.9759 + 0.00012·[R_s·√(γ_g/γ_o) + 1.25·T]^1.2
R_s = 12,500, T = 205 °F → B_o = 11.4138
Standing (1947)
Total mass flow rate (ṁ) 50,822 lb/hr
ṁ = ṁ_gas + ṁ_oil + ṁ_water
37,112 + 12,968 + 743 = 50,822 lb/hr
Mass balance
Gas mass fraction (x_g) 73.0 %
x_g = ṁ_gas / ṁ_total
37,112 / 50,822 = 73.0 %
Used to weight the Joule-Thomson coefficient

5.2 Inflow performance

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Rate at bubble point (q_b) 1,953 stb/d
q_b = J × (P_r − P_b)
0.420 × (9,850 − 5,200) = 1,953
Straight-line IPR above bubble point
Absolute open flow potential (q_max) 3,166 stb/d
q_max = q_b + J·P_b / 1.8
1,953 + 0.420(5,200)/1.8 = 3,166
Vogel (1968) composite IPR
Flowing bottomhole pressure required (P_wf) 7,107 psia
q/q_max = 1 − 0.2(P_wf/P_r) − 0.8(P_wf/P_r)² solved for P_wf
q = 1,152 stb/d → P_wf = 7,107 psia
Vogel (1968)
Drawdown at target rate (ΔP) 2,743 psi
ΔP = P_r − P_wf
9,850 − 7,107 = 2,743
Reservoir management constraint
Fraction of open flow potential 36.4 %
q / q_max
1,152 / 3,166 = 36.4 %
Rate feasibility screen

5.3 Pressure integrity

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Maximum anticipated surface pressure (MASP) 7,684 psia
MASP = P_r · exp(−0.01875·γ_g·TVD / (Z̄·T̄))
9,850 · exp(−0.01875(0.8100)(14,200)/(1.3166 × 659.7)) = 7,684
Compressible static gas column, gas-filled tubing worst case
Minimum equipment rating required 8,453 psia
MAWP_min = MASP × (1 + design margin)
7,684 × (1 + 10%) = 8,453
NESR ES-WT-002 design margin
Rated pressure of weakest upstream item 10,000 psi
min(MAWP) across flowhead, choke manifold and flowline
3 in Sch 160 flowline, 10K rated (FL-0300) = 10,000 psi
API 6A / ISO 10423 pressure class
Site pressure test value 8,453 psi
P_test = MASP × test factor
7,684 × 1.10 = 8,453
ASME B31.3 / client test procedure
Hold 15 minutes with an acceptance criterion of no visible pressure decay.

5.4 Choke sizing and flow regime

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Required choke bean size (d) 23 64ths in
d = (A · q_liq · R^B / P_wh)^(1/C)
(10.000 × 1,200 × 12,000^0.546 / 5,200)^(1/1.890) = 23.47 → 23/64 in
Gilbert (1954) multiphase critical flow correlation
Rounded up to the nearest available bean in the manifold.
Equivalent bean diameter 0.3594 in
d_in = d / 64
23 / 64 = 0.3594 in
Bean flow area (A) 0.10143 in²
A = π·d²/4
π(0.3594)²/4 = 0.10143 in²
Pressure drop across the bean (ΔP) 4,300 psi
ΔP = P_wh − P_downstream
5,200 − 900 = 4,300
Drives Joule-Thomson cooling and erosion
Downstream / upstream pressure ratio 0.173 -
P_dn / P_up vs critical ratio
900 / 5,200 = 0.173 (critical at ≤ 0.55)
Isentropic choked flow
Flow is critical. Rate is set by the bean and upstream pressure only, and is independent of separator pressure. This is the condition required for a stable, repeatable test.
CorrelationABCBean (64ths)Bean (in)
Gilbert (1954) 10.000 0.546 1.890 23.5 0.3668
Ros (1960) 17.400 0.500 2.000 21.0 0.3277
Baxendell (1957) 9.560 0.546 1.930 21.5 0.3356
Achong (1961) 3.820 0.650 1.880 24.1 0.3759

5.5 Flowline erosional velocity

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Mixture density at flowline conditions (ρ_m) 4.976 lb/ft³
ρ_m = (12409·γ_l·P + 2.7·R·γ_g·P) / (198.7·P + R·T·Z)
P = 900 psia, T = 599.7 °R, R = 12,000 scf/bbl, Z = 0.8789 → 4.976 lb/ft³
API RP 14E section 2.5
Applied erosional C-factor (C) 125.0 -
C = C_intermittent × (sand derate if applicable)
125, no derate (sand 0.60 pptb < 1.0 pptb trigger)
API RP 14E + NESR ES-WT-011
Erosional velocity limit (V_e) 56.04 ft/s
V_e = C / √ρ_m
125.0 / √4.976 = 56.04 ft/s
API RP 14E
Actual volumetric flow at flowline conditions (q) 3.6176 ft³/s
q = q_gas·B_g/86400 + (q_o·B_o + q_w)·5.615/86400
gas 2.7600 + liquid 0.8576 = 3.6176 ft³/s
Actual mixture velocity (V) 96.33 ft/s
V = q / A, A = π·d²/4
3.6176 / 0.03755 = 96.33 ft/s (2.624 in ID)
Erosional velocity ratio (EVR) 1.719 -
EVR = V / V_e
96.33 / 56.04 = 1.719
Design target ≤ 0.80
Minimum flowline ID to satisfy the limit (d_min) 3.440 in
d_min = √(4q / (π·V_e))
√(4×3.6176 / (π×56.04)) = 3.440 in
Produced solids mass rate 0.030 lb/hr
ṁ_sand = q_liq × sand / 1000 / 24
1,200 × 0.60 / 1000 / 24 = 0.030 lb/hr
Sand management trigger

5.6 Joule-Thomson cooling, hydrates and heating

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Effective Joule-Thomson coefficient (μ_JT) 0.03421 °F/psi
μ_JT = x_g·μ_gas + (1 − x_g)·μ_liquid
0.7302(0.0450) + 0.2698(0.0050) = 0.03421 °F/psi
Mass-weighted from the stream composition
Weighting matters: a gas well cools an order of magnitude more across the same pressure drop than an oil well.
Temperature drop across the bean (ΔT) 147.1 °F
ΔT = μ_JT × ΔP
0.03421 × 4,300 = 147.1 °F
Joule-Thomson expansion
Temperature downstream of the bean (T_dn) 57.9 °F
T_dn = T_wh − ΔT
205 − 147.1 = 57.9 °F
Hydrate formation temperature at separator pressure (T_h) 66.5 °F
T_h = −238.245 + 78.997·log P − 5.353·(log P)² + 349.474·γ_g − 150.855·γ_g² − 27.604·γ_g·log P
P = 900 psia, γ_g = 0.8100 → T_h = 66.5 °F
Motiee (1991)
Minimum process temperature 140.0 °F
T_req = max(T_h + margin, T_separator target)
max(66.5 + 10, 140) = 140.0 °F
Hydrate margin NESR ES-WT-004; separator target set by emulsion and viscosity control
Heating required 82.1 °F
ΔT_heat = T_req − T_dn
140.0 − 57.9 = 82.1 °F
Process heat duty (Q) 2.248 MMBtu/hr
Q = Σ(ṁ_i · c_p,i) · ΔT
(37,112×0.55 + 12,968×0.48 + 743×1.00) × 82.1 = 2,247,778 Btu/hr
Sensible heat balance, GPSA specific heats
Fired duty required 3.372 MMBtu/hr
Q_fired = Q × design factor / thermal efficiency
2.248 × 1.20 / 0.80 = 3.372 MMBtu/hr
Vendor efficiency, NESR ES-WT-006 design factor

5.7 Three-phase separation

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Gas density at separator (ρ_g) 3.7341 lb/ft³
ρ_g = 2.70·γ_g·P / (Z·T)
P = 900 psia, T = 140 °F, Z = 0.8789 → 3.7341 lb/ft³
Maximum gas velocity before carryover (V_max) 1.390 ft/s
V_max = K·√((ρ_l − ρ_g)/ρ_g)
0.40·√((48.84 − 3.7341)/3.7341) = 1.390 ft/s
Souders-Brown, API 12J, K for horizontal vessel with mist extractor
Gas disengagement area 6.283 ft²
A_gas = (1 − fill)·π·D²/4
(1 − 0.50)·π(4.00)²/4 = 6.283 ft²
Half-full horizontal vessel design case
Separator gas capacity 45.57 MMscf/d
q_max = V_max · A_gas · 86400 / B_g
1.390 × 6.283 × 86400 / 0.01656 = 45.57 MMscf/d
API 12J
Gas capacity utilisation 31.6 %
q_gas / q_max
14.400 / 45.57 = 31.6 %
Liquid volume required for retention 14.04 ft³
V = (q_o·t_o + q_w·t_w) × 5.615 / 1440
(1,152×3.0 + 48×3.0) × 5.615 / 1440 = 14.04 ft³
API 12J retention times
Liquid volume available 94.25 ft³
V = fill · π·D²/4 · L
0.50 · π(4.00)²/4 · 15.0 = 94.25 ft³
Separator liquid capacity 8,057 bbl/d
q_max = V_avail / 5.615 × 1440 / t_retention
94.25 / 5.615 × 1440 / 3.0 = 8,057 bbl/d
API 12J
Liquid capacity utilisation 14.9 %
V_required / V_available
14.04 / 94.25 = 14.9 %

5.8 Burner thermal radiation

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Total heat release at the burner (Q) 630.0 MMBtu/hr
Q = ṁ_oil·LHV_oil + q_gas·LHV_gas
0 lb/hr × 18,300 + 600,000 scf/hr × 1,050 = 630,000,000 Btu/hr
GPSA heating values
Flame length (L) 96.4 ft
L = 0.006 · Q^0.478
0.006 × (630,000,000)^0.478 = 96.4 ft
API STD 521 Annex C
Fraction of heat radiated (F) 0.150 -
Selected by combustion type
Gas burner → F = 0.150
API STD 521 Annex C
Safe distance, continuously manned area (D) 123 ft
D = √(τ·F·Q / (4π·K))
√(1.00 × 0.150 × 630,000,000 / (4π × 500)) = 123 ft
API STD 521 Table 8, 1.58 kW/m²
Radiation at the planned stand-off (K) 131 Btu/hr·ft²
K = τ·F·Q / (4π·D²)
τ·F·Q / (4π × 240²) = 131 Btu/hr·ft² (0.41 kW/m²)
API STD 521
Exposure categoryLimitEquivalentMinimum distance
Continuously manned area 500 Btu/hr·ft² 1.58 kW/m² 123 ft
Escape route, seconds of exposure 1,500 Btu/hr·ft² 4.73 kW/m² 71 ft
Equipment and unmanned areas 2,000 Btu/hr·ft² 6.31 kW/m² 61 ft

5.9 Sour service classification

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
H₂S partial pressure at MASP (p_H2S) 95.2845 psia
p_H2S = y_H2S × P
(12,400 / 10⁶) × 7,684 = 95.2845 psia
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-1
Service classification Sour service
p_H2S ≥ 0.05 psia → sour service
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156
All wetted pressure-containing components must carry NACE MR0175 certification, and personnel controls for H₂S apply for the full duration of the test.
Personal alarm set point 10 ppm
Fixed by HSE case
10 ppm
Client HSE case
Immediately dangerous to life or health 100 ppm
NIOSH IDLH
100 ppm
NIOSH

6Design limit verification

Every check below is evaluated automatically against the standard named in the basis column. A critical failure prevents this document from being issued.

RefCheckResult Actual vs limitFinding and basis
ERO-001 Erosional velocity in the flowline
critical
FAIL EVR 1.719
≤ 0.80
Mixture velocity of 96.3 ft/s exceeds the API RP 14E erosional limit of 56.0 ft/s. Minimum acceptable flowline ID is 3.44 in against the 2.624 in selected.
Action required: Select a flowline of at least 3.44 in ID, or reduce the target rate.
API RP 14E
HYD-001 Hydrate formation margin downstream of the bean
critical
FAIL -8.6 °F margin
≥ 10 °F
Without heating the stream reaches 57.9 °F against a hydrate temperature of 66.5 °F. Hydrates will form in the choke body and flowline.
Action required: Bring the heater on line before opening the well, or inject methanol / MEG at the choke inlet.
Motiee (1991) hydrate correlation, NESR ES-WT-004 margin
SOU-002 H₂S exposure controls
major
CAUTION 12,400 ppm in stream
IDLH 100 ppm
Stream H₂S concentration exceeds the IDLH threshold. Continuous gas detection, cascade breathing air, wind socks, muster points and a documented H₂S contingency plan are mandatory for the full test.
Action required: Attach the H₂S contingency plan and the drill record to this DOS before issue.
NIOSH / client HSE case
CHK-001 Critical flow across the bean
major
PASS ratio 0.173
≤ 0.55
The bean is in critical flow, so measured rates will be stable and independent of downstream conditions.
Isentropic choked flow, k ≈ 1.27
CHK-002 Choke correlation sensitivity
advisory
PASS 13.1 % spread
below 40 %
The four published correlations disagree by 13.1 % on bean size for this fluid. The correlations are in reasonable agreement for this fluid.
Comparison of Gilbert, Ros, Baxendell and Achong
DEL-001 Target rate against inflow performance
major
PASS 36.4 % of AOF
below 90 % of AOF
The target rate is comfortably inside the well's deliverability.
Vogel (1968) IPR from the supplied productivity index
FLU-001 Z-factor correlation validity
advisory
PASS T_pr 1.70 / P_pr 8.30
1.15 < T_pr < 2.4, P_pr < 15
Wellhead conditions are inside the published validity window of the correlation.
Brill & Beggs (1974)
HYD-002 Heater duty adequacy
major
PASS 3.372 MMBtu/hr required
10.00 MMBtu/hr rated
Selected heater covers the fired duty at 34 % utilisation. The selected 10.0 MMBtu/hr unit is significantly oversized at 34 % utilisation; a smaller unit would reduce mobilisation cost.
NESR ES-WT-006
PRS-001 Upstream pressure containment
critical
PASS MASP 7,684 psia
MAWP 10,000 psi
Weakest upstream component is rated 10,000 psi against a MASP of 7,684 psia, a margin of 23.2 %.
API 6A / NESR ES-WT-002
PRS-002 Separator relief protection
critical
PASS Operating 900 psia
MAWP 2,160 psi
Separator rating is adequate for the planned operating pressure. A relief valve sized for the choke-washout case is still required.
Action required: Confirm PSV set pressure at or below the vessel MAWP and size it for full choke bypass flow.
API RP 14C / API 12J
RAD-001 Thermal radiation at manned areas
critical
PASS 131 Btu/hr·ft²
500 Btu/hr·ft²
Radiation at the planned stand-off is 26 % of the manned-area limit.
API STD 521 Table 8 / IOGP 434-18
SEP-001 Separator gas handling capacity
critical
PASS 31.6 %
≤ 85 %
Vessel has adequate capacity for the design case.
API SPEC 12J
SEP-002 Separator liquid retention capacity
critical
PASS 14.9 %
≤ 85 %
Vessel has adequate capacity for the design case.
API SPEC 12J
SOU-001 Sour service material compliance
critical
PASS 95.2845 psia H₂S
≥ 0.05 psia triggers sour service
Sour service confirmed at 95.284 psia H₂S partial pressure. All rated components on the spread carry NACE MR0175 certification.
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156

7Operating limits and safety envelope

ParameterLimitBasis
Maximum anticipated surface pressure7,684 psiaStatic gas column from reservoir pressure
Site pressure test value8,453 psi, 15 minute holdASME B31.3 / client test procedure
Choke bean, design case23/64 inGoverned choke correlation
Minimum separator inlet temperature66 °F + 10 °F marginHydrate control
Maximum flowline velocity56.0 ft/sAPI RP 14E erosional limit
Separator operating pressure900 psiaDesign case, PSV set at vessel MAWP
Minimum stand-off, manned areas123 ftAPI STD 521, 500 Btu/hr·ft²
H₂S personal alarm10 ppm, evacuate at 15 ppmClient HSE case
ESD closure, surface safety valve7 seconds maximumAPI RP 14C

8Assumptions register extract

The constants, correlation coefficients and design limits below were read from the company assumptions register at the time this document was generated. Each carries its revision number, so the calculation can be reproduced exactly at any future date.

CategoryAssumptionValue RevBasis
Choke model Achong coefficient A 3.82 - 1 Achong (1961)
Choke model Achong exponent B (GLR) 0.65 - 1 Achong (1961)
Choke model Achong exponent C (bean) 1.88 - 1 Achong (1961)
Choke model Baxendell coefficient A 9.56 - 1 Baxendell (1957)
Choke model Baxendell exponent B (GLR) 0.546 - 1 Baxendell (1957)
Choke model Baxendell exponent C (bean) 1.93 - 1 Baxendell (1957)
Choke model Critical (sonic) pressure ratio 0.55 Pdn/Pup 2 Isentropic choked flow, k~1.27
Choke model Gilbert coefficient A 10 - 1 Gilbert (1954), API 14B practice
Choke model Gilbert exponent B (GLR) 0.546 - 1 Gilbert (1954)
Choke model Gilbert exponent C (bean) 1.89 - 1 Gilbert (1954)
Choke model Ros coefficient A 17.4 - 1 Ros (1960)
Choke model Ros exponent B (GLR) 0.5 - 1 Ros (1960)
Choke model Ros exponent C (bean) 2 - 1 Ros (1960)
Deliverability Vogel IPR coefficient on (Pwf/Pr) 0.2 - 1 Vogel (1968)
Deliverability Vogel IPR coefficient on (Pwf/Pr)^2 0.8 - 1 Vogel (1968)
Erosion API 14E C-factor, intermittent service 125 - 1 API RP 14E 2.5
Erosion C-factor derating when sand is present 0.6 fraction 3 NESR internal ES-WT-011
Erosion Erosional velocity ratio caution threshold 0.8 - 1 NESR internal ES-WT-011
Erosion Sand concentration triggering derate 1 pptb 2 NESR internal ES-WT-011
Heating Heater duty design factor 1.2 - 2 NESR internal ES-WT-006
Heating Indirect heater thermal efficiency 0.8 fraction 1 Vendor data, glycol bath heaters
Heating Specific heat of crude oil 0.48 Btu/lb-degF 1 GPSA Data Book Sec. 23
Heating Specific heat of gas 0.55 Btu/lb-degF 1 GPSA Data Book Fig. 24-7
Heating Specific heat of produced water 1 Btu/lb-degF 1 Standard
Hydrates Joule-Thomson cooling coefficient, gas phase 0.045 degF/psi 4 Field-calibrated, MENA gas 0.6-0.75 SG
Hydrates Minimum margin above hydrate formation temperature 10 degF 2 NESR internal ES-WT-004
Pressure integrity Minimum margin of equipment MAWP over MASP 10 % 3 NESR internal ES-WT-002
Pressure integrity Site pressure test factor on MOP 1.1 - 1 ASME B31.3 / client procedure
Radiation Atmospheric transmissivity 1 - 1 API STD 521 6.4.2
Radiation Flame length correlation coefficient 0.006 - 1 API STD 521 Annex C
Radiation Flame length correlation exponent 0.478 - 1 API STD 521 Annex C
Radiation Fraction of heat radiated, gas flare 0.15 - 1 API STD 521 Annex C
Radiation Lower heating value of associated gas 1,050 Btu/scf 2 GPSA Data Book Sec. 23
Radiation Lower heating value of crude 18,300 Btu/lb 1 GPSA Data Book Sec. 23
Radiation Radiation limit, continuously manned area 500 Btu/hr-ft2 1 API STD 521 Table 8 (1.58 kW/m2)
Radiation Radiation limit, equipment and unmanned areas 2,000 Btu/hr-ft2 1 API STD 521 Table 8 (6.31 kW/m2)
Radiation Radiation limit, escape route, few seconds exposure 1,500 Btu/hr-ft2 1 API STD 521 Table 8 (4.73 kW/m2)
Separation Design liquid fill fraction of separator volume 0.5 fraction 1 API 12J
Separation Oil retention time 3 minutes 2 API 12J Table 1, 30-40 API crude
Separation Separator utilisation caution threshold 0.85 fraction 1 NESR internal ES-WT-008
Separation Souders-Brown K, horizontal vessel with mist extractor 0.4 ft/s 1 API 12J / Arnold & Stewart
Separation Water retention time 3 minutes 1 API 12J Table 1
Sour service H2S immediately dangerous to life or health 100 ppm 1 NIOSH
Sour service H2S partial pressure threshold for sour service 0.05 psia 1 NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-1
Sour service H2S personal alarm set point 10 ppm 1 OSHA / client HSE case

9Reference standards

ReferenceTitleEditionApplied to
API RP 14CAnalysis, Design, Installation and Testing of Basic Surface Safety Systems 8th Ed.ESD architecture and relief protection
API RP 14EDesign and Installation of Offshore Production Platform Piping Systems 5th Ed.Erosional velocity limits, flowline sizing
API SPEC 12JSpecification for Oil and Gas Separators 8th Ed.Separator gas and liquid capacity
API SPEC 6ASpecification for Wellhead and Christmas Tree Equipment 21st Ed.Pressure ratings of flow control equipment
API STD 521Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems 7th Ed.Flare / burner thermal radiation and flame length
ASME B31.3Process Piping 2022Flowline wall thickness and test pressure
IOGP 434-18Risk assessment data - thermal radiation exposure 2019Personnel exposure thresholds
ISO 10423Wellhead and christmas tree equipment 2009Equipment pressure/temperature class
NACE MR0175Materials for use in H2S-containing environments (ISO 15156) 2015Sour service classification
Generated by the NESR Engineering Design Platform, Surface Well Testing module, on 13 Nov 2026 at 20:41. Calculation run reference DOS-SWT-2026-0151/R0/b7b7aa2f3e. This document is uncontrolled when printed.