Back to the design This document is generated from the same calculation run shown on the design screen. Nothing is retyped.
NESR
DOS-SWT-2026-0139 Revision 1
Issued 13 Nov 2026
Surface Well Testing

Design of Service

Extended Well Test — well QDM-0221, Qidam field
Prepared for ADNOC Onshore under ADN-2026-3390
NOT FOR ISSUE — 1 CRITICAL DESIGN CHECK UNRESOLVED

1Document control and approval

PREPARED BY
Faisal Al-Otaibi
Senior Well Test Engineer
Signature and date
REVIEWED BY
Marwa Saad
Testing Engineering Lead
Signature and date
APPROVED BY
Rajesh Nair
Regional Technical Manager
2026-08-26 11:20

Revision history

DateByActionDescription
2026-08-18 11:02 Faisal Al-Otaibi created DOS initiated for extended well test
2026-08-24 15:40 Marwa Saad reviewed Technical review complete, no comments
2026-08-26 11:20 Rajesh Nair approved Approved for execution

2Scope and objectives

This Design of Service defines the surface well testing programme for well QDM-0221 in the Qidam field, producing from the Thamama reservoir. The objective is a 168 hour extended well test at a target liquid rate of 6,200 bbl/d, with the wellhead held at 900 psia flowing pressure. All equipment sizing, operating limits and safety distances in this document are derived from the well and fluid data in section 3 using the calculation basis in section 5 and the assumptions register extract in section 8.

ClientADNOC Onshore Client referenceADN-2026-3390
Service lineSurface Well Testing Operation typeExtended Well Test
LocationOnshore Planned start2026-09-02
Planned duration168 hours Service classificationSour (see section 7)

3Well, reservoir and fluid data

Well geometry

True vertical depth6,900 ft
Measured depth7,250 ft
Maximum inclination18.0 °
Casing OD9.625 in
Tubing OD / ID4.500 / 3.958 in
Perforated interval6,720 – 6,840 ft
Packer depth6,600 ft

Reservoir

Reservoir pressure3,100 psia
Reservoir temperature208 °F
Productivity index3.20 stb/d/psi
Bubble point pressure1,450 psia

Produced fluid

Oil gravity38.6 °API
Gas specific gravity0.710
Water specific gravity1.030
Gas-oil ratio380 scf/stb
Water cut22.0 %
Hydrogen sulphide85 ppm
Carbon dioxide1.90 mol %
Nitrogen0.80 mol %
Produced solids0.40 lb/1000 bbl

Operating envelope and site

Target liquid rate6,200 bbl/d
Wellhead flowing pressure900 psia
Wellhead flowing temperature152 °F
Separator pressure250 psia
Separator inlet target temperature118 °F
Flowline length190 ft
Burner to manned area210 ft
Ambient temperature92 °F
Design wind speed14 mph

4Equipment spread

PositionAssetDescriptionMAWPTemp ratingMaterial classSour
Flowhead FH-5015 Surface Test Tree 5-1/8 in 10K 10,000 psi 250 °F API 6A EE-NL-PSL3-PR1 Yes
Choke Manifold CM-1002 Dual Choke Manifold 3-1/16 in 10K 10,000 psi 250 °F API 6A EE-NL-PSL3 Yes
Flowline FL-0400 4 in Sch 160 flowline, 10K rated 10,000 psi 250 °F ASTM A106 Gr.B / NACE Yes
Heater HT-0250 Indirect Glycol Bath Heater 2.5 MMBtu/hr 10,000 psi 250 °F ASME Sec VIII Div 1 Yes
Separator SP-1440 3-Phase Horizontal Separator 1440 psi, 42 in x 12 ft 1,440 psi 250 °F ASME Sec VIII Div 1 / NACE Yes
Surge Tank ST-0100 Atmospheric Surge Tank 100 bbl 50 psi 150 °F API 12F Yes
Burner BN-4801 Green Dragon Oil Burner, twin head — — — No
Esd ES-0001 Wellhead ESD Panel, 3-station — — — Yes

5Design calculations

Each value below is produced by the platform's calculation engine from the data in section 3. The governing expression and the substituted values are printed with every result so that the calculation can be checked line by line without access to the software.

5.1 Fluid properties

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Oil specific gravity (γ_o) 0.8319 -
γ_o = 141.5 / (131.5 + °API)
141.5 / (131.5 + 38.6) = 0.8319
API standard gravity definition
Oil rate at target (q_o) 4,836 stb/d
q_o = q_liq × (1 − WC)
6,200 × (1 − 0.220) = 4,836
Test objective
Water rate at target (q_w) 1,364 bbl/d
q_w = q_liq × WC
6,200 × 0.220 = 1,364
Test objective
Associated gas rate (q_g) 1.838 MMscf/d
q_g = q_o × GOR
4,836 × 380 = 1,837,680 scf/d
Test objective
Gas-liquid ratio (R) 296 scf/bbl
GLR = q_g / q_liq
1,837,680 / 6,200 = 296
Drives the choke correlation
Blended liquid specific gravity (γ_l) 0.8755 -
γ_l = (1 − WC)·γ_o + WC·γ_w
(1 − 0.220)·0.8319 + 0.220·1.0300 = 0.8755
Volume-weighted blend
Pseudo-critical temperature (sweet basis) (T_pc) 380.0 °R
T_pc = 169.2 + 349.5·γ_g − 74.0·γ_g²
169.2 + 349.5(0.7100) − 74.0(0.7100)² = 380.0
Sutton (1985)
Pseudo-critical pressure (sweet basis) (P_pc) 662.0 psia
P_pc = 756.8 − 131.0·γ_g − 3.6·γ_g²
756.8 − 131.0(0.7100) − 3.6(0.7100)² = 662.0
Sutton (1985)
Wichert-Aziz acid gas correction (ε) 3.33 °R
ε = 120(A^0.9 − A^1.6) + 15(B^0.5 − B⁴), A = y_H2S + y_CO2, B = y_H2S
A = 0.01908, B = 0.000085 → ε = 3.33 °R
Wichert & Aziz (1972)
Without this correction the Z-factor for this sour stream would be wrong, and every downstream volume with it.
Gas compressibility at wellhead (Z) 0.9064 -
Z = A + (1−A)/e^B + C·P_pr^D (Brill & Beggs fit to Standing-Katz)
P_pr = 1.372, T_pr = 1.624 → Z = 0.9064
Brill & Beggs (1974)
Gas density at wellhead (ρ_g) 3.111 lb/ft³
ρ_g = 2.70·γ_g·P / (Z·T)
2.70(0.7100)(900) / (0.9064 × 611.7) = 3.111
Real gas law
Oil formation volume factor (B_o) 1.2045 rb/stb
B_o = 0.9759 + 0.00012·[R_s·√(γ_g/γ_o) + 1.25·T]^1.2
R_s = 380, T = 152 °F → B_o = 1.2045
Standing (1947)
Total mass flow rate (ṁ) 83,386 lb/hr
ṁ = ṁ_gas + ṁ_oil + ṁ_water
4,151 + 58,726 + 20,509 = 83,386 lb/hr
Mass balance
Gas mass fraction (x_g) 5.0 %
x_g = ṁ_gas / ṁ_total
4,151 / 83,386 = 5.0 %
Used to weight the Joule-Thomson coefficient

5.2 Inflow performance

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Rate at bubble point (q_b) 5,280 stb/d
q_b = J × (P_r − P_b)
3.200 × (3,100 − 1,450) = 5,280
Straight-line IPR above bubble point
Absolute open flow potential (q_max) 7,858 stb/d
q_max = q_b + J·P_b / 1.8
5,280 + 3.200(1,450)/1.8 = 7,858
Vogel (1968) composite IPR
Flowing bottomhole pressure required (P_wf) 1,589 psia
q/q_max = 1 − 0.2(P_wf/P_r) − 0.8(P_wf/P_r)² solved for P_wf
q = 4,836 stb/d → P_wf = 1,589 psia
Vogel (1968)
Drawdown at target rate (ΔP) 1,511 psi
ΔP = P_r − P_wf
3,100 − 1,589 = 1,511
Reservoir management constraint
Fraction of open flow potential 61.5 %
q / q_max
4,836 / 7,858 = 61.5 %
Rate feasibility screen

5.3 Pressure integrity

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Maximum anticipated surface pressure (MASP) 2,580 psia
MASP = P_r · exp(−0.01875·γ_g·TVD / (Z̄·T̄))
3,100 · exp(−0.01875(0.7100)(6,900)/(0.8214 × 609.7)) = 2,580
Compressible static gas column, gas-filled tubing worst case
Minimum equipment rating required 2,839 psia
MAWP_min = MASP × (1 + design margin)
2,580 × (1 + 10%) = 2,839
NESR ES-WT-002 design margin
Rated pressure of weakest upstream item 10,000 psi
min(MAWP) across flowhead, choke manifold and flowline
Surface Test Tree 5-1/8 in 10K (FH-5015) = 10,000 psi
API 6A / ISO 10423 pressure class
Site pressure test value 2,839 psi
P_test = MASP × test factor
2,580 × 1.10 = 2,839
ASME B31.3 / client test procedure
Hold 15 minutes with an acceptance criterion of no visible pressure decay.

5.4 Choke sizing and flow regime

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Required choke bean size (d) 49 64ths in
d = (A · q_liq · R^B / P_wh)^(1/C)
(10.000 × 6,200 × 296^0.546 / 900)^(1/1.890) = 48.60 → 49/64 in
Gilbert (1954) multiphase critical flow correlation
Rounded up to the nearest available bean in the manifold.
Equivalent bean diameter 0.7656 in
d_in = d / 64
49 / 64 = 0.7656 in
Bean flow area (A) 0.46039 in²
A = π·d²/4
π(0.7656)²/4 = 0.46039 in²
Pressure drop across the bean (ΔP) 650 psi
ΔP = P_wh − P_downstream
900 − 250 = 650
Drives Joule-Thomson cooling and erosion
Downstream / upstream pressure ratio 0.278 -
P_dn / P_up vs critical ratio
250 / 900 = 0.278 (critical at ≤ 0.55)
Isentropic choked flow
Flow is critical. Rate is set by the bean and upstream pressure only, and is independent of separator pressure. This is the condition required for a stable, repeatable test.
CorrelationABCBean (64ths)Bean (in)
Gilbert (1954) 10.000 0.546 1.890 48.6 0.7594
Ros (1960) 17.400 0.500 2.000 45.4 0.7098
Baxendell (1957) 9.560 0.546 1.930 43.8 0.6845
Achong (1961) 3.820 0.650 1.880 40.7 0.6366

5.5 Flowline erosional velocity

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Mixture density at flowline conditions (ρ_m) 13.254 lb/ft³
ρ_m = (12409·γ_l·P + 2.7·R·γ_g·P) / (198.7·P + R·T·Z)
P = 250 psia, T = 577.7 °R, R = 296 scf/bbl, Z = 0.9692 → 13.254 lb/ft³
API RP 14E section 2.5
Applied erosional C-factor (C) 125.0 -
C = C_intermittent × (sand derate if applicable)
125, no derate (sand 0.40 pptb < 1.0 pptb trigger)
API RP 14E + NESR ES-WT-011
Erosional velocity limit (V_e) 34.34 ft/s
V_e = C / √ρ_m
125.0 / √13.254 = 34.34 ft/s
API RP 14E
Actual volumetric flow at flowline conditions (q) 1.8143 ft³/s
q = q_gas·B_g/86400 + (q_o·B_o + q_w)·5.615/86400
gas 1.3471 + liquid 0.4672 = 1.8143 ft³/s
Actual mixture velocity (V) 28.14 ft/s
V = q / A, A = π·d²/4
1.8143 / 0.06447 = 28.14 ft/s (3.438 in ID)
Erosional velocity ratio (EVR) 0.820 -
EVR = V / V_e
28.14 / 34.34 = 0.820
Design target ≤ 0.80
Minimum flowline ID to satisfy the limit (d_min) 3.113 in
d_min = √(4q / (π·V_e))
√(4×1.8143 / (π×34.34)) = 3.113 in
Produced solids mass rate 0.103 lb/hr
ṁ_sand = q_liq × sand / 1000 / 24
6,200 × 0.40 / 1000 / 24 = 0.103 lb/hr
Sand management trigger

5.6 Joule-Thomson cooling, hydrates and heating

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Effective Joule-Thomson coefficient (μ_JT) 0.00699 °F/psi
μ_JT = x_g·μ_gas + (1 − x_g)·μ_liquid
0.0498(0.0450) + 0.9502(0.0050) = 0.00699 °F/psi
Mass-weighted from the stream composition
Weighting matters: a gas well cools an order of magnitude more across the same pressure drop than an oil well.
Temperature drop across the bean (ΔT) 4.5 °F
ΔT = μ_JT × ΔP
0.00699 × 650 = 4.5 °F
Joule-Thomson expansion
Temperature downstream of the bean (T_dn) 147.5 °F
T_dn = T_wh − ΔT
152 − 4.5 = 147.5 °F
Hydrate formation temperature at separator pressure (T_h) 45.5 °F
T_h = −238.245 + 78.997·log P − 5.353·(log P)² + 349.474·γ_g − 150.855·γ_g² − 27.604·γ_g·log P
P = 250 psia, γ_g = 0.7100 → T_h = 45.5 °F
Motiee (1991)
Minimum process temperature 118.0 °F
T_req = max(T_h + margin, T_separator target)
max(45.5 + 10, 118) = 118.0 °F
Hydrate margin NESR ES-WT-004; separator target set by emulsion and viscosity control
Heating required 0.0 °F
ΔT_heat = T_req − T_dn
118.0 − 147.5 = 0.0 °F
No heating required for this design case.
Process heat duty (Q) 0.000 MMBtu/hr
Q = Σ(ṁ_i · c_p,i) · ΔT
(4,151×0.55 + 58,726×0.48 + 20,509×1.00) × 0.0 = 0 Btu/hr
Sensible heat balance, GPSA specific heats
Fired duty required 0.000 MMBtu/hr
Q_fired = Q × design factor / thermal efficiency
0.000 × 1.20 / 0.80 = 0.000 MMBtu/hr
Vendor efficiency, NESR ES-WT-006 design factor

5.7 Three-phase separation

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Gas density at separator (ρ_g) 0.8558 lb/ft³
ρ_g = 2.70·γ_g·P / (Z·T)
P = 250 psia, T = 118 °F, Z = 0.9692 → 0.8558 lb/ft³
Maximum gas velocity before carryover (V_max) 3.171 ft/s
V_max = K·√((ρ_l − ρ_g)/ρ_g)
0.40·√((54.63 − 0.8558)/0.8558) = 3.171 ft/s
Souders-Brown, API 12J, K for horizontal vessel with mist extractor
Gas disengagement area 4.811 ft²
A_gas = (1 − fill)·π·D²/4
(1 − 0.50)·π(3.50)²/4 = 4.811 ft²
Half-full horizontal vessel design case
Separator gas capacity 20.81 MMscf/d
q_max = V_max · A_gas · 86400 / B_g
3.171 × 4.811 × 86400 / 0.06333 = 20.81 MMscf/d
API 12J
Gas capacity utilisation 8.8 %
q_gas / q_max
1.838 / 20.81 = 8.8 %
Liquid volume required for retention 72.52 ft³
V = (q_o·t_o + q_w·t_w) × 5.615 / 1440
(4,836×3.0 + 1,364×3.0) × 5.615 / 1440 = 72.52 ft³
API 12J retention times
Liquid volume available 57.73 ft³
V = fill · π·D²/4 · L
0.50 · π(3.50)²/4 · 12.0 = 57.73 ft³
Separator liquid capacity 4,935 bbl/d
q_max = V_avail / 5.615 × 1440 / t_retention
57.73 / 5.615 × 1440 / 3.0 = 4,935 bbl/d
API 12J
Liquid capacity utilisation 125.6 %
V_required / V_available
72.52 / 57.73 = 125.6 %

5.8 Burner thermal radiation

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
Total heat release at the burner (Q) 1,155.1 MMBtu/hr
Q = ṁ_oil·LHV_oil + q_gas·LHV_gas
58,726 lb/hr × 18,300 + 76,570 scf/hr × 1,050 = 1,155,081,459 Btu/hr
GPSA heating values
Flame length (L) 128.8 ft
L = 0.006 · Q^0.478
0.006 × (1,155,081,459)^0.478 = 128.8 ft
API STD 521 Annex C
Fraction of heat radiated (F) 0.200 -
Selected by combustion type
Oil burner → F = 0.200
API STD 521 Annex C
Safe distance, continuously manned area (D) 192 ft
D = √(τ·F·Q / (4π·K))
√(1.00 × 0.200 × 1,155,081,459 / (4π × 500)) = 192 ft
API STD 521 Table 8, 1.58 kW/m²
Radiation at the planned stand-off (K) 417 Btu/hr·ft²
K = τ·F·Q / (4π·D²)
τ·F·Q / (4π × 210²) = 417 Btu/hr·ft² (1.32 kW/m²)
API STD 521
Exposure categoryLimitEquivalentMinimum distance
Continuously manned area 500 Btu/hr·ft² 1.58 kW/m² 192 ft
Escape route, seconds of exposure 1,500 Btu/hr·ft² 4.73 kW/m² 111 ft
Equipment and unmanned areas 2,000 Btu/hr·ft² 6.31 kW/m² 96 ft

5.9 Sour service classification

QuantityValueBasis and calculation
H₂S partial pressure at MASP (p_H2S) 0.2193 psia
p_H2S = y_H2S × P
(85 / 10⁶) × 2,580 = 0.2193 psia
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-1
Service classification Sour service
p_H2S ≥ 0.05 psia → sour service
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156
All wetted pressure-containing components must carry NACE MR0175 certification, and personnel controls for H₂S apply for the full duration of the test.
Personal alarm set point 10 ppm
Fixed by HSE case
10 ppm
Client HSE case
Immediately dangerous to life or health 100 ppm
NIOSH IDLH
100 ppm
NIOSH

6Design limit verification

Every check below is evaluated automatically against the standard named in the basis column. A critical failure prevents this document from being issued.

RefCheckResult Actual vs limitFinding and basis
SEP-002 Separator liquid retention capacity
critical
FAIL 125.6 %
≤ 85 %
Predicted load exceeds the rated capacity of the selected vessel. Carryover or level control loss is expected.
Action required: Select the next size separator, reduce the target rate, or raise separator pressure to shrink gas volume.
API SPEC 12J
ERO-001 Erosional velocity in the flowline
critical
CAUTION EVR 0.820
≤ 0.80
Velocity is at 82 % of the erosional limit. Acceptable for a short test but monitor the sand probe closely.
Action required: Select a flowline of at least 3.11 in ID, or reduce the target rate.
API RP 14E
SOU-002 H₂S exposure controls
major
CAUTION 85 ppm in stream
IDLH 100 ppm
Stream H₂S concentration exceeds the IDLH threshold. Continuous gas detection, cascade breathing air, wind socks, muster points and a documented H₂S contingency plan are mandatory for the full test.
Action required: Attach the H₂S contingency plan and the drill record to this DOS before issue.
NIOSH / client HSE case
CHK-001 Critical flow across the bean
major
PASS ratio 0.278
≤ 0.55
The bean is in critical flow, so measured rates will be stable and independent of downstream conditions.
Isentropic choked flow, k ≈ 1.27
CHK-002 Choke correlation sensitivity
advisory
PASS 16.2 % spread
below 40 %
The four published correlations disagree by 16.2 % on bean size for this fluid. The correlations are in reasonable agreement for this fluid.
Comparison of Gilbert, Ros, Baxendell and Achong
DEL-001 Target rate against inflow performance
major
PASS 61.5 % of AOF
below 90 % of AOF
The target rate is comfortably inside the well's deliverability.
Vogel (1968) IPR from the supplied productivity index
FLU-001 Z-factor correlation validity
advisory
PASS T_pr 1.62 / P_pr 1.37
1.15 < T_pr < 2.4, P_pr < 15
Wellhead conditions are inside the published validity window of the correlation.
Brill & Beggs (1974)
HYD-001 Hydrate formation margin downstream of the bean
critical
PASS 102.0 °F margin
≥ 10 °F
Stream stays 102.0 °F above the hydrate curve without heating.
Motiee (1991) hydrate correlation, NESR ES-WT-004 margin
HYD-002 Heater duty adequacy
major
PASS 0.000 MMBtu/hr required
2.50 MMBtu/hr rated
Selected heater covers the fired duty at 0 % utilisation.
NESR ES-WT-006
PRS-001 Upstream pressure containment
critical
PASS MASP 2,580 psia
MAWP 10,000 psi
Weakest upstream component is rated 10,000 psi against a MASP of 2,580 psia, a margin of 74.2 %.
API 6A / NESR ES-WT-002
PRS-002 Separator relief protection
critical
PASS Operating 250 psia
MAWP 1,440 psi
Separator rating is adequate for the planned operating pressure. A relief valve sized for the choke-washout case is still required.
Action required: Confirm PSV set pressure at or below the vessel MAWP and size it for full choke bypass flow.
API RP 14C / API 12J
RAD-001 Thermal radiation at manned areas
critical
PASS 417 Btu/hr·ft²
500 Btu/hr·ft²
Radiation at the planned stand-off is 83 % of the manned-area limit.
API STD 521 Table 8 / IOGP 434-18
SEP-001 Separator gas handling capacity
critical
PASS 8.8 %
≤ 85 %
Vessel has adequate capacity for the design case.
API SPEC 12J
SOU-001 Sour service material compliance
critical
PASS 0.2193 psia H₂S
≥ 0.05 psia triggers sour service
Sour service confirmed at 0.219 psia H₂S partial pressure. All rated components on the spread carry NACE MR0175 certification.
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156

7Operating limits and safety envelope

ParameterLimitBasis
Maximum anticipated surface pressure2,580 psiaStatic gas column from reservoir pressure
Site pressure test value2,839 psi, 15 minute holdASME B31.3 / client test procedure
Choke bean, design case49/64 inGoverned choke correlation
Minimum separator inlet temperature45 °F + 10 °F marginHydrate control
Maximum flowline velocity34.3 ft/sAPI RP 14E erosional limit
Separator operating pressure250 psiaDesign case, PSV set at vessel MAWP
Minimum stand-off, manned areas192 ftAPI STD 521, 500 Btu/hr·ft²
H₂S personal alarm10 ppm, evacuate at 15 ppmClient HSE case
ESD closure, surface safety valve7 seconds maximumAPI RP 14C

8Assumptions register extract

The constants, correlation coefficients and design limits below were read from the company assumptions register at the time this document was generated. Each carries its revision number, so the calculation can be reproduced exactly at any future date.

CategoryAssumptionValue RevBasis
Choke model Achong coefficient A 3.82 - 1 Achong (1961)
Choke model Achong exponent B (GLR) 0.65 - 1 Achong (1961)
Choke model Achong exponent C (bean) 1.88 - 1 Achong (1961)
Choke model Baxendell coefficient A 9.56 - 1 Baxendell (1957)
Choke model Baxendell exponent B (GLR) 0.546 - 1 Baxendell (1957)
Choke model Baxendell exponent C (bean) 1.93 - 1 Baxendell (1957)
Choke model Critical (sonic) pressure ratio 0.55 Pdn/Pup 2 Isentropic choked flow, k~1.27
Choke model Gilbert coefficient A 10 - 1 Gilbert (1954), API 14B practice
Choke model Gilbert exponent B (GLR) 0.546 - 1 Gilbert (1954)
Choke model Gilbert exponent C (bean) 1.89 - 1 Gilbert (1954)
Choke model Ros coefficient A 17.4 - 1 Ros (1960)
Choke model Ros exponent B (GLR) 0.5 - 1 Ros (1960)
Choke model Ros exponent C (bean) 2 - 1 Ros (1960)
Deliverability Vogel IPR coefficient on (Pwf/Pr) 0.2 - 1 Vogel (1968)
Deliverability Vogel IPR coefficient on (Pwf/Pr)^2 0.8 - 1 Vogel (1968)
Erosion API 14E C-factor, intermittent service 125 - 1 API RP 14E 2.5
Erosion C-factor derating when sand is present 0.6 fraction 3 NESR internal ES-WT-011
Erosion Erosional velocity ratio caution threshold 0.8 - 1 NESR internal ES-WT-011
Erosion Sand concentration triggering derate 1 pptb 2 NESR internal ES-WT-011
Heating Heater duty design factor 1.2 - 2 NESR internal ES-WT-006
Heating Indirect heater thermal efficiency 0.8 fraction 1 Vendor data, glycol bath heaters
Heating Specific heat of crude oil 0.48 Btu/lb-degF 1 GPSA Data Book Sec. 23
Heating Specific heat of gas 0.55 Btu/lb-degF 1 GPSA Data Book Fig. 24-7
Heating Specific heat of produced water 1 Btu/lb-degF 1 Standard
Hydrates Joule-Thomson cooling coefficient, gas phase 0.045 degF/psi 4 Field-calibrated, MENA gas 0.6-0.75 SG
Hydrates Minimum margin above hydrate formation temperature 10 degF 2 NESR internal ES-WT-004
Pressure integrity Minimum margin of equipment MAWP over MASP 10 % 3 NESR internal ES-WT-002
Pressure integrity Site pressure test factor on MOP 1.1 - 1 ASME B31.3 / client procedure
Radiation Atmospheric transmissivity 1 - 1 API STD 521 6.4.2
Radiation Flame length correlation coefficient 0.006 - 1 API STD 521 Annex C
Radiation Flame length correlation exponent 0.478 - 1 API STD 521 Annex C
Radiation Fraction of heat radiated, oil burner 0.2 - 1 API STD 521 Annex C
Radiation Lower heating value of associated gas 1,050 Btu/scf 2 GPSA Data Book Sec. 23
Radiation Lower heating value of crude 18,300 Btu/lb 1 GPSA Data Book Sec. 23
Radiation Radiation limit, continuously manned area 500 Btu/hr-ft2 1 API STD 521 Table 8 (1.58 kW/m2)
Radiation Radiation limit, equipment and unmanned areas 2,000 Btu/hr-ft2 1 API STD 521 Table 8 (6.31 kW/m2)
Radiation Radiation limit, escape route, few seconds exposure 1,500 Btu/hr-ft2 1 API STD 521 Table 8 (4.73 kW/m2)
Separation Design liquid fill fraction of separator volume 0.5 fraction 1 API 12J
Separation Oil retention time 3 minutes 2 API 12J Table 1, 30-40 API crude
Separation Separator utilisation caution threshold 0.85 fraction 1 NESR internal ES-WT-008
Separation Souders-Brown K, horizontal vessel with mist extractor 0.4 ft/s 1 API 12J / Arnold & Stewart
Separation Water retention time 3 minutes 1 API 12J Table 1
Sour service H2S immediately dangerous to life or health 100 ppm 1 NIOSH
Sour service H2S partial pressure threshold for sour service 0.05 psia 1 NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-1
Sour service H2S personal alarm set point 10 ppm 1 OSHA / client HSE case

9Reference standards

ReferenceTitleEditionApplied to
API RP 14CAnalysis, Design, Installation and Testing of Basic Surface Safety Systems 8th Ed.ESD architecture and relief protection
API RP 14EDesign and Installation of Offshore Production Platform Piping Systems 5th Ed.Erosional velocity limits, flowline sizing
API SPEC 12JSpecification for Oil and Gas Separators 8th Ed.Separator gas and liquid capacity
API SPEC 6ASpecification for Wellhead and Christmas Tree Equipment 21st Ed.Pressure ratings of flow control equipment
API STD 521Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems 7th Ed.Flare / burner thermal radiation and flame length
ASME B31.3Process Piping 2022Flowline wall thickness and test pressure
IOGP 434-18Risk assessment data - thermal radiation exposure 2019Personnel exposure thresholds
ISO 10423Wellhead and christmas tree equipment 2009Equipment pressure/temperature class
NACE MR0175Materials for use in H2S-containing environments (ISO 15156) 2015Sour service classification
Generated by the NESR Engineering Design Platform, Surface Well Testing module, on 13 Nov 2026 at 20:41. Calculation run reference DOS-SWT-2026-0139/R1/8e1e9aaaad. This document is uncontrolled when printed.